Podoby neskoreho kapitalizmu :: Remember, remember, the velvet November


node:	Podoby neskoreho kapitalizmu
template:	3
parent:	Empire State of Sabotage Embassy
owner:	aufhebung
created:	15.04.2018 - 18:42:50
updated:	20.04.2018 - 12:27:21

cwbe coordinatez:
809096
8486632

ABSOLUT
KYBERIA

permissions
you:	r,
system:	public
net:	yes

niekt0	0
leather glov...	0
afross	0
mashina	0
aufhebung	1
Zlad!	1
umarian	1
VitaminC	1
dobre boty[L...	1
MIJ	1
Burning A	1
imnot	2
skurva.	2
bgdny	5
čo	5
dita	5
Huto	5
unsane	6
markey	6
Mowe	6
ip	8
vrq	8
paradigm shift	10
i!	15
bugy	15
yank	15
.lee.	16
pstmn	16
Alien DuX	20
Vilozof	20
kybu	22
slavisa rubi...	25
Schwester	26
anjinator	33
Demogorgon	33
killya	33
society's lies	34
Kwisatz Hade...	34
ni	36
WooDy	38
zdienka	38
kata mach	39
esina v pond...	40

forum venovane zvlastnym ukazom za ktorymi sa skryva fetis komodity

008090960848663208513219

Uplne neviem ci to sem patri, ale celkom je to zabava a padaju klucove slova ako marxism, postmodernism, peterson

008090960848663208512590

00809096084866320851259008512852

Haha ked si sikovny startuper mysli ze je expert na vsetko. Ehm je mi to nejake povedome...

don't take my kindness as a sign of weakness

00809096084866320851259008512689

zaujimave pochody ma tento tpk
35357604_2204896742870348_3729292018325651456_n.jpg?_nc_cat=0&oh=93fcfeb93c2d48bd5879c1074df1b523&oe=5BB17B57

35357604_2204896742870348_3729292018325651456_n.jpg?_nc_cat=0&oh=93fcfeb93c2d48bd5879c1074df1b523&oe=5BB17B57

0080909608486632085125900851268908512951

35464493_474136016339470_89984851955941376_n.jpg?_nc_cat=0&oh=dcc5bbfb6fef4ef4b2cff2bc16b644e4&oe=5BBDBE23

0080909608486632085125900851268908512943

Az na to ze herman melville nebol velryba.

008090960848663208511264

http://www.plusminusnula.sk/2018/04/jonas-strouhal-bistro-affluenza/

Inštalácia Jonáša Strouhala Bistro Affluenza sa v prvej rovine prezentuje ako priamočiara alegória zvráteností kapitalizmu. Ako alegória pozoruhodnej schopnosti kapitalizmu zmeniť aj našu bolesť, utrpenie, nedostatky – skrátka dôsledky vykorisťovania – na niečo potenciálne trhovo atraktívne tak, že z nich urobí niečo nielen žiadúce, ale aj zdravé, priateľské k životnému prostrediu. Ale, tak ako v mnohých prípadoch, problém nespočíva v tom, že by sme si ho neboli teoreticky vedomí, ale v tom, že vždy potrebujeme reálny zážitok na to, aby sme zistili, čo naozaj cítime a možno aj to, kým naozaj sme. Strouhalova ponuka na stole je priamočiara, ale prináša množstvo možných interpretácií.

19_WEB_%C2%A9-2018-Peter-Snadik_94A5316.jpg

19_WEB_%C2%A9-2018-Peter-Snadik_94A5316.jpg

008090960848663208511142

https://twitter.com/sarahblakemedia/status/1006173520219508736

vitanie tyrana

008090960848663208510717

som zvedavy ci budu citovat aj odtialto https://monthlyreview.org/2009/05/01/why-socialism/

008090960848663208509948

00809096084866320850994808509952

Tak ma to uplne logiku. Ist na mesiac pomahat stavat triedu sirotincu v Afrike je menej efektivne ako dat mesacny plat, za ktory zaplatia niekolko kvalifikovanejsich lokalnych ludi aby ho postavili.
Ale nevyzera to tak dobre na instagrame...

0080909608486632085099480850995208510079

https://www.jacobinmag.com/2015/08/peter-singer-charity-effective-altruism/

First, capital actually has what the imperiled stranger needs. Whereas most individuals generally only possess necessities for themselves and their families, institutions bound by the logic of capital accumulation collectively own virtually all the necessities that individuals must purchase in order to survive.

That such an arrangement results in objectionable consequences should hardly be surprising. Here we see just one of them: capital will let the drowning stranger die unless it receives adequate payment. Regardless of what we do, capital’s position remains the same: the drowning stranger’s life isn’t worth the cost of the life-preserving necessity. Moreover, capital’s participation in the rescue is contingent on the ability to profit from it.

For capital, this is just another transaction — and why shouldn’t it be? This principle is implicit in every exchange for life-sustaining necessities, even if it only becomes explicit when someone can’t afford them.

Second, capital creates “drowning strangers.” The inability of companies to profit from those with little or no purchasing power is the reason why so many poor people need altruists to save them.

Yet their purchasing power is itself mostly determined by capital’s need for their labor. Despite the fact that people living in poverty have the capacity to contribute to society in important ways, it’s often just not profitable for businesses or neoliberal states to pay them enough to do so.

Moreover, capital’s commodification of necessities directly undermines the self-sufficiency of entire populations by determining how resources are allocated.

As charities and Effective Altruists publicize how badly the global poor need food, for example, capital acquires and controls their fertile land, using it to grow crops that can be sold for higher returns to populations with deeper pockets. The farming practices it brings require already-scarce water supplies and are slated to overdraw the sources of those supplies — to say nothing of ecological havoc like mass extinction and global climate change.

In the meantime, capital extracts around $2 trillion annually from “developing countries” through things like illicit financial flows, tax evasion, debt service, and trade policies advantageous to the global capitalist class.

The loss of these revenues and resources for developing countries and their people is capital’s gain. Individuals’ ability to do rudimentary things like feed themselves becomes contingent on their ability to outbid others in a global marketplace where the winner determines how their local resources are used.

Governments’ lost revenues, and the structural adjustment programs these conditions precipitate, are then used to justify cuts to essential services like malaria eradication programs — one of Effective Altruists’ favorite philanthropic causes — predictably resulting in tens of thousands of deaths.

These dynamics, which spring from capital’s insistence on the commodification of necessities, are what turn billions of people into drowning strangers and generate a need for ever-multiplying charitable organizations in the first place.

Finally, everything mentioned above constrains a concerned non-capitalist’s ability to intervene. Aside from challenging the rule of capital, a non-capitalist’s only readily available option is donating to charity — thus subsidizing its profiting from basic necessities — or else ignoring those in need.

008090960848663208509948085099520851007908510085

antikapitalisti vycitaju inym ze nie su antikapitalisti
skoda ze fook nefunguje ako ma a tieto sracky pretekaju do last :/

00809096084866320850994808509952085100790851008508510094

zdrcujuca kritika

0080909608486632085099480850995208510079085100850851009408510095

Je to presne tolko kritiky kolko si ten clanok zasluzi. Katolik kritizuje evanjelika ze nie je katolik. Co o tom treba dalej pisat?

008090960848663208509948085099520851007908510085085100940851009508510100

az na to ze tu nejde o vieru ale opis materialnych mechanizmov ako k tomu dochadza
tie mechanizmy nemozno kritizovat lebo su systemove a to sa nerobi lebo lebo to sa nerobi

00809096084866320850994808509952085100790851008508510094085100950851010008510102

Kritizovat mozno vselico, akurat clanok sa vola "against charity" a hovori ze charita je napicu a treba znicit kapitalizmus. Viera je tam vo vela veciach, ale v tom, ze po zniceni kapitalizmu nebude "treba" charitu je celkom nepopieratelne.

0080909608486632085099480850995208510079085100850851009408510095085101000851010208510104

chapem ze zivot je lahsi ked si kritiku zhrnies do strasiaka "znicit kapitalizmus"

008090960848663208509948085099520851007908510085085100940851009508510100085101020851010408510107

nic som nezhrnul, to je posledna veta ci dve clanku.

(zivot je imho skor lahsi pre veriacich ktori uz spoznali nespochybnitelnu pravdu)

00809096084866320850994808509952085100790851008508510094085100950851010008510102085101040851010708510109

mas dve skupiny tych ktori tvrdia ze sa s tym neda nic robit a ti ktori ze to treba zmenit lebo to bude pokracovat dalej vzhladom na to co tam bolo detailne opisane

0080909608486632085099480850995208510079085100850851009408510095085101000851010208510104085101070851010908510502

toto je lepsi rez ked si chceme takto zjednodusit svet dvoma skupinami http://slatestarcodex.com/2018/01/24/conflict-vs-mistake/

0080909608486632085099480850995208510079085100850851009408510095085101000851010208510104085101070851010908510112

"treba zmenit"
Akurat ze nemaju odpovede co a ako aby vysledok nebol horsi ako sucasnost, a ani ich nemozu mat lebo vychadzaju zo zlych premis.

008090960848663208509948085099520851007908510085085100940851009508510100085101020851010408510107085101090851011208510115

sucasnost nie je ruzova preto existuje toto forum
som zvedavy dokedy sa budeme hrat ze ten vonkajsi svet este nie je natolko zly aby sme si stale vyberali moznosti ktore ho zhorsuju

00809096084866320850994808509952085100790851008508510087

Asi si to necital vobec, clanok je o zlepsovani goodwill kapitalistickych firiem, ktore maju nie celkom ciste praktiky. Pomozu smrtelne choremu dietatu, vysadia stromcek atd a naraz su vnimani lepsie. Vytlcu z toho viac kapitalu a vsetko je potom akoze lepsie.

U nas je taka firma napriklad Lidl.

0080909608486632085099480850995208510079085100850851008708510090

"asi si to necital vobec"
asi si to necital vobec, clanok je kritika EA lebo vychadza z "burzoaznej moralky" a burzoazna moralka je napicu lebo kapitalizmus treba znicit.

008090960848663208509948085099520851007908510085085100870851009008510111

Ako konkretne to vychadza z "burzoaznej" moralky?

00809096084866320850994808509952085100790851008508510087085100900851011108510113

"The core problem is the bourgeois moral philosophy that the movement rests upon."
neskusis si ten clanok teda precitat? :)

0080909608486632085099480850995208510079085100850851008708510090085101110851011308510114

Oni su skor tou burzoaznou moralkou obmedzovani, nez ze by z nej vychadzali.

0080909608486632085099480850995208509956

utilitarna etika a jej limity- problem je ze charita je len sposob ako dalej udrziavat a rozmnozovat existujuce problemy + charita v podobe akej existuje je megaojeb
https://kyberia.sk/id/8502934

008090960848663208509948085099520850995608510025

btw, si akceleracionista?

00809096084866320850994808509952085099560851002508510077

uz sa o tom vela pisalo ale taka chudoba v afrike je korelovana prave charitativnou pomocou ktora ju udrziava v stave zavislosti na pozickovych entitach

ked to spojis s faktom ze zapad afriku vysava doslova tym ze odtial vybera viac ako dava https://www.theguardian.com/global-development-professionals-network/2014/jul/22/africa-rescue-aid-stealing-resources

tak nemusim byt ani akceleracionista aby som to kritizoval

0080909608486632085099480850995208509956085100250851007708510089

to btw som tam napisal preto, pretoze moja otazka nesuvisi bezprostredne s povodnou temou, len by ma zaujimalo ci si sa vzhliadol v akceleracionizme

login::		password::
	name:: id::