Podoby neskoreho kapitalizmu :: Row, row, row your boat, gently down the stream. Merrily, merrily, merrily, merrily, life is but a dream.


node:	Podoby neskoreho kapitalizmu
template:	3
parent:	Empire State of Sabotage Embassy
owner:	aufhebung
created:	15.04.2018 - 18:42:50
updated:	20.04.2018 - 12:27:21

cwbe coordinatez:
809096
8486632

ABSOLUT
KYBERIA

permissions
you:	r,
system:	public
net:	yes

infect	0
mashina	0
bgdny	0
pht	0
mj	0
tom_myto	0
aufhebung	0
VitaminC	0
ip	0
niekt0	0
toxygen	0
paradigm shift	0
afross	0
opytz	0
Burning A	1
michalides	2
hihihi	2
unsane	2
we're fine, ...	2
punkheart	2
zeromind	2
DzejAr	4
sven	4
drzor	5
umarian	5
jolly good	6
Barix	6
evad[Locked_...	7
leather glov...	7
pstmn	7
scully	7
Nubia	9
WooDy	12
Faun	14
teflon	14
imnot	17
čo[Locked_OUT]	21
esina v pond...	23
Demogorgon	23
_	23
forcer	24
anjinator	24
Vilozof	26
Huto	26
denimkolos	27
.lee.	27
Mju	27
MIJ	47
One Man Bukk...	53
bugy{outKasted}	60
DFH	60
kkid	61
yank	67
Zlad!	77
i!	80
killya	80
dita	80
dobre boty[L...	91
skurva.	92
Alien DuX	110
kybu	112
slavisa rubi...	115
omg, zas kabal?	124
Kwisatz Hade...	124
ni	126
zdienka	128
kata mach	129

forum venovane zvlastnym ukazom za ktorymi sa skryva fetis komodity

008090960848663208690237

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-05-16/where-worlds-unsold-cars-go-die

008090960848663208681800

https://www.nybooks.com/articles/2019/12/05/against-economics

There is a growing feeling, among those who have the responsibility of managing large economies, that the discipline of economics is no longer fit for purpose. It is beginning to look like a science designed to solve problems that no longer exist.

A good example is the obsession with inflation. Economists still teach their students that the primary economic role of government—many would insist, its only really proper economic role—is to guarantee price stability. We must be constantly vigilant over the dangers of inflation. For governments to simply print money is therefore inherently sinful. If, however, inflation is kept at bay through the coordinated action of government and central bankers, the market should find its “natural rate of unemployment,” and investors, taking advantage of clear price signals, should be able to ensure healthy growth. These assumptions came with the monetarism of the 1980s, the idea that government should restrict itself to managing the money supply, and by the 1990s had come to be accepted as such elementary common sense that pretty much all political debate had to set out from a ritual acknowledgment of the perils of government spending. This continues to be the case, despite the fact that, since the 2008 recession, central banks have been printing money frantically in an attempt to create inflation and compel the rich to do something useful with their money, and have been largely unsuccessful in both endeavors.

We now live in a different economic universe than we did before the crash. Falling unemployment no longer drives up wages. Printing money does not cause inflation. Yet the language of public debate, and the wisdom conveyed in economic textbooks, remain almost entirely unchanged.

One expects a certain institutional lag. Mainstream economists nowadays might not be particularly good at predicting financial crashes, facilitating general prosperity, or coming up with models for preventing climate change, but when it comes to establishing themselves in positions of intellectual authority, unaffected by such failings, their success is unparalleled. One would have to look at the history of religions to find anything like it. To this day, economics continues to be taught not as a story of arguments—not, like any other social science, as a welter of often warring theoretical perspectives—but rather as something more like physics, the gradual realization of universal, unimpeachable mathematical truths. “Heterodox” theories of economics do, of course, exist (institutionalist, Marxist, feminist, “Austrian,” post-Keynesian…), but their exponents have been almost completely locked out of what are considered “serious” departments, and even outright rebellions by economics students (from the post-autistic economics movement in France to post-crash economics in Britain) have largely failed to force them into the core curriculum.

As a result, heterodox economists continue to be treated as just a step or two away from crackpots, despite the fact that they often have a much better record of predicting real-world economic events. What’s more, the basic psychological assumptions on which mainstream (neoclassical) economics is based—though they have long since been disproved by actual psychologists—have colonized the rest of the academy, and have had a profound impact on popular understandings of the world.

008090960848663208681498

entreprecariat_silvio-lorusso_onomatopee_harold-1080x1080.jpg

Entrepreneur or precarious worker? These are the terms of a cognitive dissonance that turns everyone’s life into a shaky project in perennial start-up phase. Silvio Lorusso guides us through the entreprecariat, a world where change is natural and healthy, whatever it may bring. A world populated by motivational posters, productivity tools, mobile offices and self-help techniques. A world in which a mix of entrepreneurial ideology and widespread precarity is what regulates professional social media, online marketplaces for self-employment and crowdfunding platforms for personal needs. The result? A life in permanent beta, with sometimes tragic implications.

“A compelling and relentless j’accuse: debunking the social and political myths that push an increasing number of persons to perform in the entrepreneurship circus — with no safety nets.”
— Antonio Casilli, author of En attendant les robots, 2019
https://silviolorusso.com/work/entreprecariat-eng/

008090960848663208680655

How big tech is dragging us towards the next financial crash

2451.jpg?width=1900&quality=85&auto=format&fit=max&s=eb999c9f31fab0e5b857d4d8f3319bbd

2451.jpg?width=1900&quality=85&auto=format&fit=max&s=eb999c9f31fab0e5b857d4d8f3319bbd

No matter what the Silicon Valley giants might argue, ultimately, size is a problem, just as it was for the banks. This is not because bigger is inherently bad, but because the complexity of these organisations makes them so difficult to police. Like the big banks, big tech uses its lobbying muscle to try to avoid regulation. And like the banks, it tries to sell us on the idea that it deserves to play by different rules.
-----
It is no accident that most of the wealth in our world is being held by a smaller and smaller number of rich individuals and corporations who use financial wizardry such as tax offshoring and buy-backs to ensure that they keep it out of the hands of national governments. It is what we have been taught to think of as normal, thanks to the ideological triumph of the Chicago School of economic thought, which has, for the past five decades or so, preached, among other things, that the only purpose of corporations should be to maximise profits.
https://www.theguardian.com/business/2019/nov/08/how-big-tech-is-dragging-us-towards-the-next-financial-crash

008090960848663208680625

Neviem ci je na to lepsie forum:

Instagram broke the news on Twitter [...], where the Facebook-owned brand announced that “starting today, we’re expanding our test of private like counts globally.” If you’re part of this test, “you’ll no longer see the total number of likes and views on photos and videos posted to Feed unless they’re your own.”
https://petapixel.com/2019/08/07/influencers-vs-instagram-hiding-like-counts-sparks-tears-and-controversy/

Kazdopadne well done, budovat si znacku na instagrame ci FB a potom vyplakavat ked zmenia pravidla.

#likes #influencers #realjob #advertising

00809096084866320868062508680677

ja som sa prave velmi cudoval, ze fcb/instagramu v podstate lietaju miliardy von oknom, ked z reklamy influencerov nemaju ziadny podiel, pritom im zadarmo poskytuju zakladne nastroje a cakalsom kedy to zacnu riesit

00809096084866320868062508680670

Facebook&Google davno dostali bianco sek robit si co chcu, toto je len spicka ladovca.

0080909608486632086806250868067008680683

to mi je uplne jasne
prave preto je ironicke, ze ludia picuju prave na takuto picovinku ze im zobrali jediny zdroj dopaminu v ich zivote

008090960848663208680625086806700868068308680763

Ak som správne pochopil, tak im zobrali len oficiálnu metriku, ktorou mohli preukázať dosah svojich príspevkov a tým aj dosah reklamy v nich obsiahnutej. Takže ak bude značka, ktorú instagramer propaguje, chcieť vedieť, za čo mu platí, bude potrebovať dáta od instagramu - a za to po novom tiež zaplatí, ale tentoraz aj tej platforme.

00809096084866320868062508680670086806830868076308680803

značky skorej zaujíma dosah príspevku ako samotné lajky a tieto informácie máš samozrejme naďalej k dispozícií, takisto aj počet likov, len ho vidíš iba ty ako majiteľ accountu. čiže voči klientom sa nič nezmenilo, majú od majiteľa účtu úplne tie isté informácie ako predtým.

skús si prepnúť account na "business" a môžeš is to pozrieť kludne sám :)

0080909608486632086806250868067008680683086807630868080308680918

ok, asi máš pravdu, ja instagram účet mám, no nepoužívam, takže ma ber s rezervou. v akom zmysle ale potom podľa toho článku mal tento krok pomôcť instagramu k tomu, aby získal podiel z toho reklamného koláča?

008090960848663208680625086806700868068308680763086808030868091808681227

popravde netuším ako to má pomôcť instagramu monetizovať reklamu od bežných userov, kedže instagram zarába na sponsored príspevkoch celkom dosť :)

008090960848663208680625086806700868068308680687

Pre niektorých je to zdroj obživy

00809096084866320868062508680670086806830868068708680829

popularita ti zostava, len publikum nevidi srdieckovu metriku.

00809096084866320868062508680670086806830868068708680752

Point being?

0080909608486632086806250868067008680683086806870868075208680762

že tie náreky nie sú asi len o tom, že sa im nedostáva dopamín

008090960848663208680625086806700868068308680687086807520868076208681018

Tak si aspon konecne najdu zmysluplnu robotu nez oblbovat retardov eyecandy lifestyle-om.

00809096084866320868062508680670086806830868068708680752086807620868101808681030

je to viac ako toto

ak urobis ciaru za tymto, treba ju spravit aj za celym marketingom ako oblbovakom ludi, pretoze toto je najsilnejsi trend jeho - videjo na yt ci insta post funguje ovela lepsie ako reklamna prestavka v kablovke

pre obrazok dovcera neexistujuca znacka dnes ohodnotena za billions vdaka influencerstvu
https://e.dennikn.sk/minuta/1656285
Coty sa dohodla s Kylie Jenner, že za 600 miliónov dolárov prevezme väčšinový podiel v jej kozmetickej značke.
Kylie Jenner má masívny výtlak na sociálnych médiách, kde ju sleduje viac ako 270 miliónov ľudí. Za uplynulých 12 mesiacov jej kozmetická značka dosiahla čisté tržby 177 miliónov dolárov, odhaduje Coty.

influencerov dost vyuzivaju aj neziskovky...

0080909608486632086806250868067008680683086806870868075208680762086810180868103008681031

ciaru mozes skusit hodit ako sipku do oblasti kde konci autenticka all-too-human tuzba po zdielani/socializacii a zacina personal brand building selfpromo praca

008090960848663208680625086806700868068308680687086807520868076208681018086810300868103108681039

no hej ale tu mozes vhodit neustale poucenie ze jedno sa casom v kapitalizme hned premiena na druhe
este aj tu kybcu sme si komodifikovali kackami doslovne premenene na Ecoiny

00809096084866320868062508680670086806830868068708680752086807620868101808681023

ig influencerstvo je v podstate to iste ako sem postovat nakupy a fotky z vyletov, len profesionalne/vo vacsom. co keby raz Padre vypol kacka?

008090960848663208680625086806700868068308680686

Ja sa "tesim" az davy youtuberov pridu na to, ze cela ich slava je zalozena na tom, ze si neotvaraju hubu proti korporacii s ktorou zjiu v symbioze, a ze cela pracne budovana kariera moze skoncit z hodiny na hodinu.

00809096084866320868062508680644

akonahle ludstvo akceptovalo socialne siete ako fulltime job tak vpustilo do internetov cire zlo a nanichodnost
takto maju vsecia infulenceri pred sebov sudne a kadejake opletacky \:D/

e: lebo ziaden pricetny clovek nepovazuje odfoteny pekac v leginach ako vytvorenu hodnotu to iste plati pre sponzorovany nazor.

00809096084866320868062508680640