login::  password::




cwbe coordinatez:
101
63533
5211994
8375628

ABSOLUT
KYBERIA
permissions
you: r,
system: public
net: yes

neurons

stats|by_visit|by_K
source
tiamat
K|my_K|given_K
last
commanders
polls

total descendants::3
total children::2
1 K

show[ 2 | 3] flat


1953 – Discover human source code
2000 – Read human source code
2017 – Edit human source code
https://www.technologyreview.com/s/608350/first-human-embryos-edited-in-us/




0000010100063533052119940837562808403243
himself[Locked_OUT]
 himself[Locked_OUT]      06.10.2017 - 00:23:30 (modif: 06.10.2017 - 00:34:01), level: 1, UP   NEW !!CONTENT CHANGED!!
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v548/n7668/full/nature23305.html

Updated online 02 October 2017
Editorial Note: Readers are alerted that some of the conclusions of this paper are subject to critiques that are being considered by editors. Some of these critiques have been publicly deposited in preprint form. A further editorial response will follow the resolution of these issues.

https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2017/08/28/181255

0000010100063533052119940837562808375927
ulkas
 ulkas      28.07.2017 - 17:33:59 , level: 1, UP   NEW
ten edit tam bol snad aj ovela skorej, nez samotny full read. akurat, ze tento edit je metodou CRISPR

000001010006353305211994083756280837592708403255
himself[Locked_OUT]
 himself[Locked_OUT]      06.10.2017 - 00:54:49 (modif: 06.10.2017 - 06:15:57) [1K] , level: 2, UP   NEW !!CONTENT CHANGED!!
Doteraz sa upravovali iba somatické bunkové línie, nie zárodočné línie a hlavne nie celé embryá. Problémom je najmä legislatíva.

Prvé pokusy robili v číne, ale s nedobrými výsledkami, hlavným problémom bol mozaicizmus a neželané mutácie.
http://www.nature.com/news/chinese-scientists-genetically-modify-human-embryos-1.17378
http://www.nature.com/news/second-chinese-team-reports-gene-editing-in-human-embryos-1.19718

Asi ako reakciu spojené štáty legislatívu zvolnili a tá práca spomínaná vyššie bola prvý prípad, kedy sa modifikovali celé embryá bez off-target efektov. Ten článok je teraz ale pod celkom ťažkou kritikou (viď príspevok vyššie).