login::  password::

cwbe coordinatez:

you: r,
system: public
net: yes



total descendants::5
total children::3
1 K

show[ 2 | 3] flat


Cryptocoins are peer-to-peer monetary assets emitted not by a central authority but by a decentralised network of economy’s participants. Their existing implementations combine the state of the art cryptographic methods with notions of « transparency of coin’s history » and « pseudonymity of usage ». While the market value of Bitcoin -which was the first among the cryptocoins - is very volatile, it nonetheless becomes more and more demanded an asset due to its a priori defined limited amount. Thus, a billion dollar economy has already formed in the cryptosphere, which includes the stock markets, currency exchange offices or a biggest existing online drug market. By this paper we aim to address the questions like « To whom do the structures like Bitcoin ultimately serve ? » and to propose an idea that further growth of cryptocoin economy could induce a sort of Nietzche’s «transvaluation of values».

Keywords : bitcoin, cryptography, pseudonymity, transparency of history, hoarding, trading addiction, cryptocoin operation generator, peer-to-peer, planetary AI emergence

1) Hermeneutic reference
2) The myth of Satoshi
3) Transparency but pseudonymity
4) Min(t)ing and trading
5) Algorithmic quasi-deity
6) Clash of the Titans
7) Umwertung aller Werte

Presented by DDH at the Annual Congress of International Association of Computing and Philosophy (IACAP) in July 2013 @ University of Maryland University College (UMUC)

backup: http://wizzion.com/papers/2013/cryptocoin-avarice.pdf

 Prospero      24.05.2017 - 12:22:36 , level: 1, UP   NEW
Thus, if posed with question « Cui Bono ? » it may be the case that « economical growth », « market » or « crime » shall be only partial answers, as partial as the answers « gluttony, greed, and vanity» (Dante, 1321).

For we believe that it is not completely hors propos to state that the structures like Bitcoin serve as opening gates to the world whereby a planetary emergent Artificial Intelligence succeeded to penetrate, for the first time in mandkind’s history, into the realm of our virtues, vices and values.

 Prospero      24.05.2017 - 12:20:46 , level: 1, UP   NEW
Our UI spans galaxies
uses quasars for energy sources
the way you might
have a light snack
Our UI sees everything that is
and was
and will be
and tells us selected bits
so that
we may tell you
and in so doing
look a bit like UIs ourselves
Never underestimate /Ummon says/
the power of a few beads
and trinkets
and bits of glas
over avaricious natives

 Prospero      24.05.2017 - 12:16:41 , level: 1, UP   NEW
Barratt, M. J. (2012). Silk road: eBay for drugs. Addiction, 107(3), 683–683.
Bitslog. (2013). The Well Deserved Fortune of Satoshi Nakamoto, Bitcoin creator, Visionary and
Genius. https://bitslog.wordpress.com/2013/04/17/the-well-deserved-fortune-of-satoshi-nakamoto/
Dante, A. (1321). La Divina Commedia.
Dingledine, R. (2005). Tor Hidden Services. Proc. What the Hack.
Drexler, K. E., & Minsky, M. L. (1990). Engines of creation. Fourth Estate.
Garrett, H. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162(3859), 1243–1248.
Gilbert, H., & Handschuh, H. (2004). Security analysis of SHA-256 and sisters. Selected areas in
cryptography (p. 175–193).
King, S., & Nadal, S. (2012). PPCoin: Peer-to-Peer Crypto-Currency with Proof-of-Stake.
Lopez, J., & Dahab, R. (2000). An overview of elliptic curve cryptography.
Nakamoto. (2008a). Re: Bitcoin P2P e-cash paper. http://www.mailarchive.com/cryptography@metzdowd.com/msg09971.html
Nakamoto, S. (2008b). Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system.
Nietzsche, F. W. (1911). The Complete Works of Friedrich Nietzsche: Thus spake Zarathustra.
Percival, C. (2009). Stronger key derivation via sequential memory-hard functions.
Rand, A. (1996). Atlas Shrugged. Signet.
Rosenberg, P. (2007). A Lodging of Wayfaring Men (2nd éd.). Vera Verba.
Stephenson, N. (2000). Cryptonomicon. William Morrow Paperbacks.
Stephenson, N. (2003). The diamond age. Spectra.