login::  password::




cwbe coordinatez:
809096
1483077

ABSOLUT
KYBERIA
permissions
you: r,
system: public
net: yes

neurons

stats|by_visit|by_K
source
tiamat
K|my_K|given_K
last
commanders
polls

total descendants::
total children::682
53 K

show[ 2 | 3] flat


sob0
ulkas0
aarin0
dno0
LordScorpion0
leather glov...0
talk0
diagnoza: av...0
belo0
tom_myto0
ventYl0
maaca0
krvsh0
niekt00
Trilobite0
jnsn0
Mr. Darcy0
al-caid0
total trash0
bebe0
kyberbubus0
pht0
unsane1
edvard gray1
or.lock1
_zajo_1
didaktikskalica1
borg2
blurec2
selectriques2
mashina2
Zlad!2
kljucevskaya2
lekvarik2
Miyamoto3
sioux3
@OMs3
harso3
gnd3
DzejAr3
ananas5
Hawros5
aktiff5
azazel5
5
darmozrac8
Matwe8
Torrio8
semantic fre...8
brisco8
mifo8
esc8
pilier8
xrat9
no49
mirny9
wern10
dark matter10
enemista11
skurva.11
andread11
nin11
teflon11
techko11
evadka11
anubis11
11
soc13
wq14
ivik15
darkforce15
mzpx16
lupus yonderboy16
kabal[Locked...17
drakh17
bgdny17
hargi17
ageron19
faggotcore20
zyn20
zrnk☉20
superpussy22
t24
kono24
palino25
StiX25
repelent27
Red RejveN29
Ty30
ode31
klepeta31
Shalko32
stick33
runway33
revenant33
knut33
samoo36
dragulievic37
fook38
Deus38
ach38
ovarovekoleno38
AZ38
acidrop39
killya45
Kiith-Sa47
Trpaslik47
juraj48
tossi rukinen48
Malyf48
The Royal Ca...51
mofo51
smrtak53
neclovek53
mmad53
whiteline53
b.b.53
ZAP54
AGDAX57
lily of the ...57
bdY57
pyxel57
mrkqua59
R@10059
Enuma L]X[60
kcs60
zena v domac...60
dusanson60
zdienka63
and.65
kata mach65
aspirateur65
oxid66
keskusta67
137871
871
weirdo71
PAS-T-ELKY72
scarce72
bBaran77
sad&kvet77
Martini78
yesimka80
iskra80
kostja87
Huto87
sosso87
rozmarin87
maioiam87
rob87
gapa87
jv88
13390
ksyz99
jaRo100
ne102
your biggest...106
sunrise106
chory nos106
shulo110
maniac113
skera117
vevericky ho...123
jacobo127
NoC129
sagasta130
dd131
s7133
~135
jian136
triyen137
thx145
k0zmonAut152
Peace is Dead157
ondrish164
polar165
dontbelight166
touch me i\'...168
robo176
Carpathian181
vlastos184
hilda197
AmIprincess?197
exe_bege202
:j4nc0206
miloo209
arius215
C220
maximus220
SouNdbOY d224
tybyk238
242
L_aura*246
chaos walk w...255
batakh261
edna soledadova263
asebest265
Smeal267
One Man Bukk...271
yaron271
kujon271
helium273
ahasver275
smolkop276
Jahman277
muna285
prihoda286
lpk287
džadža287
bira289
antimon290
súdruh Kilián290
coffee291
PjONi295
Odi296
wsk297
empties302
rot[Locked_OUT]302
tigeree302
max.g303
break!fast303
otex a owad306
coxwain314
druha lapa duhu317
MicE317
medik318
daemonique319
vezir319
dogfood319
Gerronimo320
"."321
ona321
dlhy322
dulb324
1001326
aschenblond327
tony clifton327
kedilek332
And I swallo...359
chimeque365
JoHnY365
Dar2365
pandeMia366
d3nzel371
lula371
mystickeprasa379
pikseliahky379
tramalia389
hmgnc389
bujak398
konec.japonec400
paradigm shift407
Toth408
zayo417
.:stigma:.418
tomas420
linker420
P01424
fisheye_100427
majou432
a432
hroch432
4mood441
calavera441
farebna447
baza447
crowd​ con...448
mr gramma450
binary riot452
Ruza461
1480161470
MARS480
aqwarel485
e_496
mateno503
sniper507
_____508
marmite542
solidarity i...548
barzyako575
xtabay594
dorje603
laykaa635
Cicer651
deawoo660
gucci676
vixtor677
Keywords: Copyright, ACTA, DMCA, DRM, Intellectual Property, WIPO, Open Source, GPL, Creative Commons, Software Patents...

Plagiarism is necessary, progress implies it. It closely grasps an authors's sentence, uses his expresions, deletes a false idea, replaces it with a right one. Lautreamont, 1870

Works are of value only if they give rise to better ones. Alexander von Humboldt, 1839

If nature has made any one thing less susceptible than all others of exclusive property, it is the action of the thinking power called an idea.. Thomas Jefferson, 1813 >>

Forum o copyrightoch, spolocnosti, umeni, hnuti copyleft. Patenty, a intelektualne vlastnictvo este len zacinaju ovplyvnovat nasu spolocnost. Myslime si ze negativne, a ze zo zanikom verejnej domeny (public domain) prichadza i zanik verejneho priestoru, verejnej debaty a verejnosti ako navzajom prepojeneho celku.

Co je to:
DMCA - Digital Millenium Copyright Act
DRM - Digital Rights Management
Intellectual Property, Cesky clanok o I.P.
WIPO - World Intellectual Property Organization
TCPA - Trusted Computing Platform Alliance
ACTA - Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement

Alternativa - OPEN CONTENT LICENCES:
GNU GPL "OpenSource" Licencia
Creative Commons Najcastejsie pouzivana "copyleft" alternativa
Creative Commons Slovensko
Free Software Foundation
Electronic Frontier Foundation

Blogy zaoberajuce sa problematikou:
Freedom To Tinker - fundovane info
Patent l 0 - insiders blog o patentoch
bIPlog - Berkeley Intellectual Property Bloq
Managing RM - Fajn blog o DRM
Copyfight - Nazov o vsetkom. Aktualne

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Free Content funguje!
Zoznam Netovych Labelov: http://www.phlow.de/netlabels/


Amen Brother Breaks Documentary - culture isn't possible without public domain
Good Copy Bad Copy - a documentary about the current state of copyright and culture
Steal This Film I - WE WANTED TO MAKE A FILM THAT WOULD EXPLORE THIS HUGE POPULAR MOVEMENT (TPB Agitprop)
Steal This Film II - P2P Agitprop


moneymongers rhetorics: (contribute with urs)






RIP WHAT.CD FUCK THE MAN


Spoločnosť pre otvorené informačné technológie (SOIT) fighting for you!




008090960148307708345875
ulkas
 ulkas      22.05.2017 - 07:25:09 [14K] , level: 1, UP   NEW
The European Parliament has passed draft rules mandating 'content portability', i.e. the ability to take your purchased content and services across borders within the EU. Freedom of movement rules, which allow EU citizens to live and work anywhere in the EU, require that the individual is able to take their life with them -- family, property, and services. Under the new rules, someone who pays for Netflix or BBC iPlayer and then moves to another EU country will retain access to those services and the same content they had previously. Separately, rules to prevent geofencing of content within the EU entirely are also moving forward.
https://torrentfreak.com/eu-votes-today-on-content-portability-to-reduce-piracy-170518/

00809096014830770834587508346285
jnsn
 jnsn      22.05.2017 - 18:35:43 , level: 2, UP   NEW
chceme decentralizovany internet a sluzby kde hranice nebudu existovat!!!

008090960148307708343378
or.lock
 or.lock      16.05.2017 - 18:51:23 , level: 1, UP   NEW
Čaute,

potom ako dali v novembri dole what.cd - pls, neviete či sa nevytvorilo už niečo obdobné a náhradné?

Ď.

00809096014830770834337808343397
pht
 pht      16.05.2017 - 19:17:51 , level: 2, UP   NEW
https://redacted.ch/

0080909601483077083433780834339708343398
or.lock
 or.lock      16.05.2017 - 19:21:41 , level: 3, UP   NEW
A je to celé premigrované (funguje starý nick a heslo?), alebo opäť nové a na pozvánky?

Lebo interface je veľmi podobný.

008090960148307708343378083433970834339808343413
pht
 pht      16.05.2017 - 20:05:25 , level: 4, UP   NEW
je to pokracovanie a prakticky to iste ale stare konta nefunguju, what.cd databaza bola stratena,
okolo 1m torrentov zatial, priblizne polovica co bolo na what
https://interviewfor.red/en/index.html

008090960148307708332899
Mr. Darcy
 Mr. Darcy      23.04.2017 - 08:11:45 [7K] , level: 1, UP   NEW
Somewhere at Google there is a database containing 25 million books and nobody is allowed to read them.
https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2017/04/the-tragedy-of-google-books/523320/

00809096014830770833289908333190
mirex
 mirex      24.04.2017 - 08:28:18 [1K] , level: 2, UP   NEW
Pekny clanok o tom, ako google skenoval vsetky knihy ku ktorym sa dostal.

He offered the library a deal: You let us borrow all your books, he said, and we’ll scan them for you. You’ll end up with a digital copy of every volume in your collection, and Google will end up with access to one of the great untapped troves of data left in the world. Brin put Google’s lust for library books this way: “You have thousands of years of human knowledge, and probably the highest-quality knowledge is captured in books.” What if you could feed all the knowledge that’s locked up on paper to a search engine?

By 2004, Google had started scanning. In just over a decade, after making deals with Michigan, Harvard, Stanford, Oxford, the New York Public Library, and dozens of other library systems, the company, outpacing Page’s prediction, had scanned about 25 million books. It cost them an estimated $400 million. It was a feat not just of technology but of logistics.

Every weekday, semi trucks full of books would pull up at designated Google scanning centers. The one ingesting Stanford’s library was on Google’s Mountain View campus, in a converted office building. The books were unloaded from the trucks onto the kind of carts you find in libraries and wheeled up to human operators sitting at one of a few dozen brightly lit scanning stations, arranged in rows about six to eight feet apart.

The stations—which didn’t so much scan as photograph books—had been custom-built by Google from the sheet metal up. Each one could digitize books at a rate of 1,000 pages per hour. The book would lie in a specially designed motorized cradle that would adjust to the spine, locking it in place. Above, there was an array of lights and at least $1,000 worth of optics, including four cameras, two pointed at each half of the book, and a range-finding LIDAR that overlaid a three-dimensional laser grid on the book’s surface to capture the curvature of the paper. The human operator would turn pages by hand—no machine could be as quick and gentle—and fire the cameras by pressing a foot pedal, as though playing at a strange piano.


...
Upon hearing that Google was taking millions of books out of libraries, scanning them, and returning them as if nothing had happened, authors and publishers filed suit against the company, alleging, as the authors put it simply in their initial complaint, “massive copyright infringement.”
...
It only took a couple of years for the authors and publishers who sued Google to realize that there was enough middle ground to make everyone happy. This was especially true when you focused on the back catalog, on out-of-print works, instead of books still on store shelves. Once you made that distinction, it was possible to see the whole project in a different light. Maybe Google wasn’t plundering anyone’s work. Maybe they were giving it a new life. Google Books could turn out to be for out-of-print books what the VCR had been for movies out of the theater.
...
Those who had been at the table crafting the agreement had expected some resistance, but not the “parade of horribles,” as Sarnoff described it, that they eventually saw. The objections came in many flavors, but they all started with the sense that the settlement was handing to Google, and Google alone, an awesome power. “Did we want the greatest library that would ever exist to be in the hands of one giant corporation, which could really charge almost anything it wanted for access to it?”, Robert Darnton, then president of Harvard’s library, has said.

Darnton had initially been supportive of Google’s scanning project, but the settlement made him wary. The scenario he and many others feared was that the same thing that had happened to the academic journal market would happen to the Google Books database. The price would be fair at first, but once libraries and universities became dependent on the subscription, the price would rise and rise until it began to rival the usurious rates that journals were charging, where for instance by 2011 a yearly subscription to the Journal of Comparative Neurology could cost as much as $25,910.

0080909601483077083328990833319008333336
ulkas
 ulkas      24.04.2017 - 12:38:12 , level: 3, UP   NEW
pred rokom som cital o lepsom sposobe digitalizovania knih, v principe sa jednalo o jednoduchy radar/rontgen, ktory presvietil zavretu knihu napriec a detekoval zmeny, ktore nastali medzi obycajnym papierom a potlacou. malo to byt velmi presne e efektivne.

skusal som to googlit ale nemam asi tie spravne slova na to.

008090960148307708312773
ulkas
 ulkas      10.03.2017 - 10:50:49 , level: 1, UP   NEW
The European Union's top court ruled in May 2014 that people could ask search engines, such as Google or Microsoft's Bing, to remove inadequate or irrelevant information from the web results produced from searches for people's names. Today, the court is limiting the so-called "right to be forgotten" principle, ruling that individuals cannot demand that personal data be erased from company records in an official register. Reuters reports:
In Thursday's ruling the European Court of Justice said that company registers needed to be public to ensure legal certainty and to protect the interests of third parties. Company registers only contained a limited amount of personal information and, as executives in companies should disclose their identity and functions, it said. This did not constitute too severe an interference in their private lives and personal data. However, the court said there might be specific situations in which access to personal data in company registers could be limited, such as a long period after a company's dissolution. But this should be determined on a case-by-case bas

008090960148307708310474
ulkas
 ulkas      06.03.2017 - 09:16:42 , level: 1, UP   NEW
On Monday, W3C (World Wide Web Consortium) director Tim Berners-Lee released a post defending his decision to allow Netflix, Microsoft, Apple and Google to enshrine DRM in Web standards, arguing that blocking it would be pointless. Zak Rogoff, FSF campaigns manager, writes in the response:

"As Director of the W3C (World Wide Web Consortium), Berners-Lee has the ability to block [the DRM proposal] from ratification as an official Web standard... Of course, a refusal to ratify could not immediately stop the use of DRM, but it could meaningfully weaken the position of DRM in the court of public opinion, and put EME proponents Netflix, Microsoft, Apple, and Google on notice that a very prominent figure was willing to stand up to them on behalf of users. Changes in society's technological infrastructure require political movements, not just technological arguments, and political movements benefit greatly from the support of prominent figures."

Berners-Lee takes the position that "The web has to be universal, to function at all. It has to be capable of holding crazy ideas of the moment, but also the well polished ideas of the century. It must be able to handle any language and culture. It must be able to include information of all types, and media of many genres. Included in that universality is that it must be able to support free stuff and for-pay stuff, as they are all part of this world.

"This means that it is good for the web to be able to include movies, and so for that, it is better for HTML5 to have EME than to not have it."

00809096014830770831047408319146
ulkas
 ulkas      23.03.2017 - 12:34:50 , level: 2, UP   NEW
The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) has formally put forward highly controversial digital rights management as a new web standard. "Dubbed Encrypted Media Extensions (EME), this anti-piracy mechanism was crafted by engineers from Google, Microsoft, and Netflix, and has been in development for some time," reports The Register. "The DRM is supposed to thwart copyright infringement by stopping people from ripping video and other content from encrypted high-quality streams." From the report:
The latest draft was published last week and formally put forward as a proposed standard soon after. Under W3C rules, a decision over whether to officially adopt EME will depend on a poll of its members. That survey was sent out yesterday and member organizations, who pay an annual fee that varies from $2,250 for the smallest non-profits to $77,000 for larger corporations, will have until April 19 to register their opinions. If EME gets the consortium's rubber stamp of approval, it will lock down the standard for web browsers and video streamers to implement and roll out. The proposed standard is expected to succeed, especially after web founder and W3C director Sir Tim Berners-Lee personally endorsed the measure, arguing that the standard simply reflects modern realities and would allow for greater interoperability and improve online privacy. But EME still faces considerable opposition. One of its most persistent vocal opponents, Cory Doctorow of the Electronic Frontier Foundation, argues that EME "would give corporations the new right to sue people who engaged in legal activity." He is referring to the most recent controversy where the W3C has tried to strike a balance between legitimate security researchers investigating vulnerabilities in digital rights management software, and hackers trying to circumvent content protection. The W3C notes that the EME specification includes sections on security and privacy, but concedes "the lack of consensus to protect security researchers remains an issue." Its proposed solution remains "establishing best practices for responsible vulnerability disclosure." It also notes that issues of accessibility were ruled to be outside the scope of the EME, although there is an entire webpage dedicated to those issues and finding solutions to them.

0080909601483077083104740831914608332917
niekt0
 niekt0      23.04.2017 - 10:15:41 , level: 3, UP   NEW
vsetko "super", ale pls. uvadzaj aj zdroj

008090960148307708296775
ulkas
 ulkas      09.02.2017 - 10:12:33 , level: 1, UP   NEW
Microsoft Azure will now offer customers protection against patent trolling, via Redmond's considerable collection of 10,000 legal patents. The practice of patent trolling has become an industry hazard for startups in the last fifteen years, with companies forming solely for the purpose of exploiting obscure or difficult-to-research patents which may overlap with the IP of startups. As of today, Azure is offering 'uncapped indemnification coverage', including coverage against open-source implementations of entities such as Hadoop, which forms the basis of Azure's HD Insight product.

00809096014830770829677508296792
ventYl
 ventYl      09.02.2017 - 10:33:55 [2K] , level: 2, UP   NEW
to zas niekto nieco fixol na zlom konci. namiesto toho aby sa poriesil patent trolling sa riesi, ako z neho nemat nocnu moru.

well done guys. well done.

Shitty life is like radiation. You can sustain it for long time if daily doses are small.

0080909601483077082967750829679208296795
ulkas
 ulkas      09.02.2017 - 10:36:02 , level: 3, UP   NEW
tak volny trh, mas klientelu, ktora si zaplati, aby nebola vydierana vypalnikmi.

008090960148307708296775082967920829679508297359
niekt0
 niekt0      10.02.2017 - 01:50:36 , level: 4, UP   NEW
Ta klientela ktori si za to zaplati v skutocnosti prave vypalnikom zaplatila:)

008090960148307708296258
ulkas
 ulkas      08.02.2017 - 14:38:47 , level: 1, UP   NEW
dt1655-copy.jpg?w=1024

00809096014830770829625808296264
ulkas
 ulkas      08.02.2017 - 14:46:51 , level: 2, UP   NEW
Gee, that sounded so exciting. All this talk about images. If the editors had bothered to click the github link, they'd have seen this on the first page:

The Metropolitan Museum of Art provides select datasets of information on more than 420,000 artworks in its Collection for unrestricted commercial and noncommercial use. ...

Images not included

Images are not included and are not part of the dataset. Companion artworks listed in the dataset covered by the policy are identified in the Collection section of the Museum’s website with the Creative Commons Zero (CC0) icon.

It's metadata. No pictures. Hence the wikipedia links in the lame and misleading article.

Reply to This

008090960148307708292730
kyberbubus
 kyberbubus      01.02.2017 - 18:03:53 [2K] , level: 1, UP   NEW
je to známe už dlho, ale zodpovedné firmy to asi majú na saláme - platiaci zákazník dostane horšiu kvalitu, ako neplatiaci, aj kvôli tomu je motivovaný neplatiť.
http://technet.idnes.cz/platici-zakaznik-nejhure-0hm-/tec_technika.aspx?c=A170126_151357_tec_technika_nyv

×÷ßßß$ˇ~[☼◙ş→☻ü84ó♀ÇüŮń§►♫☺♀♂ć☺<\ˇ

00809096014830770829273008292735
azazel
 azazel      01.02.2017 - 18:14:53 , level: 2, UP   NEW
Problem su poskytovatelia contentu, ako napriklad SONY, tfuj!

008090960148307708288792
SYNAPSE CREATOR
 ulkas      26.01.2017 - 16:39:25 , level: 1, UP   NEW  HARDLINK
Automakers are using the Digital Millennium Copyright Act to shut down tools used by car mechanics -- but three states are trying to stop them. An anonymous reader quotes IFixIt.Org:
in 2014, Ford sued Autel for making a tool that diagnoses car trouble and tells you what part fixes it. Autel decrypted a list of Ford car parts, which wound up in their diagnostic tool. Ford claimed that the parts list was protected under copyright (even though data isn't creative work) -- and cracking the encryption violated the DMCA. The case is still making its way through the courts. But this much is clear: Ford didn't like Autel's competing tool, and they don't mind wielding the DMCA to shut the company down...

Thankfully, voters are stepping up to protect American jobs. Just last week, at the behest of constituents, three states -- Nebraska, Minnesota, and New York -- introduced Right to Repair legislation (more states will follow). These 'Fair Repair' laws would require manufacturers to provide service information and sell repair parts to owners and independent repair shops.

Activist groups like the EFF and Repair.org want to "ensure that repair people aren't marked as criminals under the DMCA," according to the site, arguing that we're heading towards a future with many more gadgets to fix. "But we'll have to fix copyright law
https://repair.org/

008090960148307708251681
gnd
 gnd      18.11.2016 - 01:34:50 , level: 1, UP   NEW
Via ach
http://www.theverge.com/2016/11/17/13669832/what-cd-music-torrent-website-shut-down

;((((

Dufam ze co sa tyka OPSEC su ok.. Ale pochybujem o tom.

00809096014830770825168108251769
or.lock
 or.lock      18.11.2016 - 10:48:27 , level: 2, UP   NEW
O fuck!

00809096014830770825168108251684
ananas
 ananas      18.11.2016 - 01:40:18 , level: 2, UP   NEW
:(

008090960148307708241987
SYNAPSE CREATOR
 rooter      02.11.2016 - 09:50:14 [7K] , level: 1, UP   NEW  HARDLINK
You may have thought that if you owned your digital devices, you were allowed to do whatever you like with them. In truth, even for possessions as personal as your car, PC, or insulin pump, you risked a lawsuit every time you reverse-engineered their software guts to dig up their security vulnerabilities—until now.

Last Friday, a new exemption to the decades-old law known as the Digital Millennium Copyright Act quietly kicked in, carving out protections for Americans to hack their own devices without fear that the DMCA’s ban on circumventing protections on copyrighted systems would allow manufacturers to sue them. One exemption, crucially, will allow new forms of security research on those consumer devices. Another allows for the digital repair of vehicles. Together, the security community and DIYers are hoping those protections, which were enacted by the Library of Congress’s Copyright Office in October of 2015 but delayed a full year, will spark a new era of benevolent hacking for both research and repair.
https://www.wired.com/2016/10/hacking-car-pacemaker-toaster-just-became-legal/?mbid=social_fb

008090960148307708212048
ulkas
 ulkas      09.09.2016 - 08:33:08 , level: 1, UP   NEW
Reuters is reporting that Playboy has won a lawsuit against a Netherlands news site for linking to photos without permission: "'It is undisputed that GS Media (which owns GreenStijl) provided the hyperlinks to the files containing the photos for profit and that Sanoma had not authorized the publication of those photos on the internet,' the Luxembourg-based Court of Justice of the European Union (ECJ) said in a statement. 'When hyperlinks are posted for profit, it may be expected that the person who posted such a link should carry out the checks necessary to ensure that the work concerned is not illegally published.' The European Commission, the EU executive, is set next week to propose tougher rules on publishing copyrighted content, including a new exclusive right for news publishers to ask search engines like Google to pay to show snippets of their articles."
Neil_Brown adds:
The Court of Justice of the European Union has ruled today on whether posting, on a website, hyperlinks to copyright infringing works constitutes a "communication to the public" for the purposes of EU copyright law, an act which requires permission of the rights holder or other authorizing basis. The court held that, if the links are provided "without the pursuit of financial gain by a person who did not know or could not reasonably have known the illegal nature of the publication of those works on that other website," the act of posting the hyperlink is not an infringement of copyright. However, if the links are providing in the pursuit of financial gain, the poster of such links is deemed to have known that they were infringing copyright, unless they can prove otherwise. The court has stated that those sites operating "for profit" are expected to have carried out the (impossible?) "necessary checks to ensure that the work concerned is not illegally published on the website to which those hyperlinks lead." The court does not clarify what is meant by "the pursuit of financial gain." If previous decisions are followed, any sites which host ads (Papasavvas), or perhaps even just accrue value to a brand (if the Advocate General's opinion in McFadden is followed), might be treated as operating for financial gain.

008090960148307708209834
niekt0
 niekt0      05.09.2016 - 21:37:55 , level: 1, UP   NEW
https://juliareda.eu/2016/08/victory-for-net-neutrality/

008090960148307708153006
niekt0
 niekt0      20.05.2016 - 23:40:06 (modif: 21.05.2016 - 10:45:33) [2K] , level: 1, UP   NEW !!CONTENT CHANGED!!
http://www.mesec.cz/clanky/jak-jsem-nahlasil-nelegalni-software-bsa-test/

tldr: Kam sa da az dostat na zakladne anonymneho udania vymyslenej osoby (neexistujucej organizacii)

008090960148307708129760
ulkas
 ulkas      11.04.2016 - 15:18:26 [1K] , level: 1, UP   NEW
http://allpriorart.com/

All Prior Art is a project attempting to algorithmically create and publicly publish all possible new prior art, thereby making the published concepts not patent-able. The concept is to democratize ideas, provide an impetus for change in the antiquated patent system, and to preempt patent trolls. The system works by pulling text from the entire database of US issued and published (un-approved) patents and creating prior art from the patent language. While most inventions generated will be nonsensical, the cost to computationally create and publish millions of ideas is nearly zero – which allows for a higher probability of possible valid prior art.

00809096014830770812976008129872
LordScorpion
 LordScorpion      11.04.2016 - 18:12:15 , level: 2, UP   NEW
az na to, ze patent sa stava platnym, az ked ho nejaka ta patentova komisia schvali. pri poziadani o patent platis nemaly peniaz za to, ze to vobec tato komisia bude riesit. takze si neviem celkom predstavit, ze by vsetky tie miliony blbosti, co to vygeneruje, dali patentovat.

ale ako idea dobra.

itnavody.sk

0080909601483077081297600812987208130025
ulkas
 ulkas      11.04.2016 - 22:36:30 , level: 3, UP   NEW
Je tam nejaky precedens, ze staci prosto publikovat. Ak budrs prvy, tak vies potom zabranit inemu si to patentovat, hoci ty sam na to patwnt nrmas.

Respektive, niekto iny si to moze patentovat ale ty v ramci kradeze patwntu sa oevolas na twn free clanok.


Samsung onoho casu argumentoval filmom space odysea v ramxi sporu s apple ohladom tabletov. To ti staci ppukazat na to, ze si neukradol patent, ale prevzal free clanok